Nocona · Identification & Dating
Dating / ID atlas
| Signal | How to use | Caution |
|---|---|---|
| Nocona Boot Company, Nocona, Texas stamp | Strong pre-1981 independent era | Photograph; labels evolve |
| Justin co-marks | Post-acquisition / modern | Ownership year ≠ stamp year |
| Mid-century lizard / Teju | Collector value thesis in collector accounts | Verify skin; quality varies |
| Shaft stitch grammar | More conservative vs Lama flash | Soft tell |
| “N” / longhorn | CBDB — verify-on-pair | Code meanings require documentation |
| COO / Made in | Pre-1999 Nocona vs later supply | Pair label beats mythology |
Documentation limits
- 1925 operations vs 1926 incorporate.
- Post-1999 factory map by SKU.
- CBDB “Kruse” surname — not established by the cited sources.
- 1981 litigation narratives conflict — settlement terms remain uncertain.
Nocona: looking up a number
Keep all groups of numbers separate. Photograph the exact label and any STYLE heading. Some configurations encode toe and heel choices; do not interpret every four-digit group as a year. We have not verified a universal Nocona date-code rule.
Open the manufacturer’s website
Toe/heel configuration is not a date
A Nocona code discussion quoting a retailer guide describes a configuration ending in 403 as a #4 toe with a #03 heel. Preserve the full pattern and verify that the pair uses that system. The remaining digits should not automatically become a manufacture date or a skin identification.
Compare dated catalogs, labels, and maker responses for older pairs. A vintage Nocona dating discussion illustrates the limits of trying to read a year from every stamp.
A missing search result means the number is not documented here yet. It does not establish that the boots are counterfeit.
Search reviewed records